Blackfella, whitefella - it's time to stand together
Exposing fabricated Aboriginal history, 60 Years of UN 'First Nations' scheming + were Australia's first inhabitants neither pygmy nor Aboriginal?
(Image source: Blacklisted Research)
Australian people have generally accepted widespread scientific consensus on face value without really understanding what the evidence actually is.
One thing that needs to be noted about the claim of there being some sort of scientific consensus, is that this is not how science works. This is how politics works. Science is not based on a vote. Nor is it based on popularity or democracy.
Blacklisted Research
Fake Aboriginal History & Culture Revealed
This article contains transcript notes from a video that seeks the truth regarding Australia’s Aboriginal history. Fake Aboriginal History & Culture Revealed was produced prior to Australia’s Voice to Parliament referendum in 2023 but is just as relevant now, if not more. 30% of national parks in New South Wales alone are already closed to Australian people and the ridiculous UN/WEF Agenda 21/30 goal for the whole of Australia is 80%.
Australian journalist and former crown prosecutor Josephine Cashman has written extensively about the bigger picture of the United Nations’ long planned Australian invasion: 60 Years of UN scheming to create ‘First Nations’ – the divide-and-conquer tactics aim to condition everyday people into accepting the idea of separate First Nations and ultimately dismantling countries for the sake of global governance.
Blacklisted Research - Fake Aboriginal History & Culture Revealed
July 31, 2023 (30 mins)
Western Australian cave paintings depict images of inhabitants who pre-date the Aboriginals
Of particular interest in the Blacklisted Research video, are the historical citations and potential archaeological evidence proving that pygmies inhabited Australia before the Aboriginals.
But most people are unaware that between 1837 and 1839, cave paintings were discovered in Western Australia by explorer, governor, and politician Sir George Grey (1812-1898) and his party, which depicted inhabitants who were neither native nor pygmy.
Sandstone Cave with Paintings near Glenelg River. Drawn on stone by George Barnard from a sketch by Captain George Grey.
(Image source: gutenberg.net.au)
Colour image of Sandstone Cave
(Image source: Magyar leader Goz Goz - Have Humanity’s Origins Been Whitewashed?)
The following journal excerpt and images are from Journals Of Two Expeditions Of Discovery In North-West And Western Australia, During The Years 1837, 1838, and 1839, written by Sir George Grey and published in 1841 (Under the Authority of Her Majesty's Government)
‘…whatever may have been the age of these paintings, it is scarcely probable that they could have been executed by a self-taught savage. Their origin, therefore, I think must still be open to conjecture.
But the art and skill with which some of the figures are drawn, and the great effect which has been produced by such simple means, renders it most probable that these paintings must have been executed with the intention of exercising an influence upon the fears and superstitious feelings of the ignorant and barbarous natives: for such a purpose they are indeed well calculated; and I think that an attentive examination of the arrangement of the figures we first discovered, more particularly of that one over the entrance of the cave, will tend considerably to bear out the conclusion I have here advanced.’
Sir George Grey - Esquire, explorer and politician who was appointed Governor of South Australia in 1840 when the colony was suffering from economic depression. Although his economic measures were popularly resented, he nearly balanced the colony's budget over five years.
Samples of more cave paintings published in Sir George Grey’s Journal
Figure drawn on side of Cave, discovered March 26th
Total length of painting 3 feet 6 3/4 inches.
Figure drawn on roof of Cave, discovered March 29th
The principal painting in it was the figure of a man, ten feet six inches in length, clothed from the chin downwards in a red garment which reached to the wrists and ankles; beyond this red dress the feet and hands protruded and were badly executed.
…This figure was so drawn on the roof that its feet were just in front of the natural seat, whilst its head and face looked directly down on anyone who stood in the entrance of the cave, but it was totally invisible from the outside. The painting was more injured by the damp and atmosphere, and had the appearance of being much more defaced and ancient, than any of the others which we had seen.*
(*Footnote. This figure brings to mind the description of the Prophet Ezekiel: Men portrayed upon the wall, the images of the Chaldeans portrayed in vermilion, girded with girdles upon their loins, exceeding in dyed attire upon their heads, all of them princes to look to, after the manner of the Babylonians of Chaldea, the land of their nativity. Chapter 23:14, 15.)
Were Australia’s first inhabitants the Magyar people?
I discovered this information about Sir George Grey’s Western Australian expedition from original royal Magyar leader Goz Goz, who stated that the cave paintings depict Australia’s first inhabitants - the Magyar people. The word 'Magyar' literally means 'great/core/seed family of all peoples'. Many Aboriginal people agree with this heavily suppressed version of Australian history.
Goz Goz is currently being unlawfully detained and injected against his will with harmful substances in Sydney’s St Vincent’s Hospital, under the supervision of psychiatrist Matthew Cullen.
I will present this side of the story in more detail in a separate article.
Blacklisted Research - Fake Aboriginal History & Culture Revealed
Transcript Excerpts
Narrator: In recent years, various aspects of Australian history and culture have faced critical scrutiny from activists and members of the press who align themselves with Aboriginal advocacy.
Australia has been painted with a broad brush of genocide of its so-called native people and widespread oppression has followed to silence the very rich history of what they are calling precolonial civilisation. And if you challenge any of this and point out its flaws, you are morally bad person who insults Aboriginal people and wounds their self-esteem.
It seems to me that purposely placed disinformation has made its way into the realm of history, academia, science, education and even entertainment. These actions are aimed at challenging and delegitimising Australia as a nation.
How much of this has been exaggerated and fabricated by the Aboriginal industrial complex? Is it, or is it not, politically loaded and how much of it is even true?
60,000 years of continued Aboriginal existence - based more on politics than conclusive scientific evidence
Aboriginals are native to the land of Australia with a history spanning back more than 60,000 years of continued existence. We are told that there is a widespread scientific consensus on this issue and that there exists genetic DNA evidence as well as anthropological and archaeological evidence. The Australian people have generally accepted this on face value without really understanding what the evidence actually is.
One thing that needs to be noted about the claim of there being some sort of scientific consensus, is that this is not how science works. This is how politics works. Science is not based on a vote. Nor is it based on popularity or democracy.
Science is based on facts, empirical data and the exploration of hard evidence. The claim of Aboriginal nativity and the 60,000 year long continued existence is based more so in politics than it is in conclusive scientific evidence. There are many historical biases, methodological concerns and even alternative interpretations that have been presented by critics with scientific backing, but these are usually swept under the rug and ignored.
These claims of 60,000 years and nativity seem to be published all over the internet and repeated exhaustively by authors and journalists, so what is the actual scientific evidence behind the claim of Aboriginals being native to the land and having a continued existence for more than 60,000 years?
Genetic study commissioned by the Australian Research Council
Upon closer examination, the foundation of this narrative appears to rest in three key focal points. There is a reference to a genetic study commissioned by the Australian Research Council on behalf of the University of Adelaide in 2014. Yet accessing this study presents considerable challenges, with links frequently missing, broken or obscured behind a pay wall requiring a $30 fee. Fortunately, I was able to acquire a PDF copy of this study through alternative means.
When you read back the abstract and conclusions of this study, the entire premise is based on DNA in hair samples collected from 111 people across Australia, 44 being Aboriginal people, in the early to mid-1900s. How much of the Aboriginal DNA was pure, admixture or the result of miscegenation, is not even mentioned or considered in this study. (Miscegenation is marriage or admixture between people who are members of different races.)
In the first few pages of this study breakdown, they openly admit that their findings are based on theoretical calculations, on theoretical timelines in a theoretical molecular clock:
‘The timing of human arrival in Australia was estimated using the age of the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for the different Australian-only haplogroups calculated using a molecular clock with substitution rates calibrated with ancient European and Asian mitogenomes. Although these TMRCA values are likely to be minimal estimates given the limited sampling, they group in a narrow window of time.’
The scientists concluded that the mitochondrial DNA tracing showed that the Aboriginal people of Australia have genetic ties and are related to other Melanesian people of the Indian Ocean, with their closest relative being the people of Papua New Guinea. They also claimed that Aboriginals must have been here for 50,000 years because that's how long ago they estimate the land masses between Australia and Papua have been separated by ocean water, isolating the Aboriginals from other land masses of the Indian Ocean.
The study's findings remain speculative at best
This comprehensive study was initiated with funding from individuals who possessed a pre-existing historical bias and a clear political agenda. Despite being bestowed with numerous awards, the study's findings remain speculative at best, as acknowledged by the scientists themselves who based their conclusions on theory and calculations rather than concrete, irrefutable evidence. There were many critics who claimed that the sample sizes were too small or that the data interpretation was flawed, leading to inaccurate conclusions.
There were others who showed that the presence of ancient DNA in the region could be equally attributed to interactions with neighboring populations rather than a continuous occupation by the same ancestral group. In fact, it seems more likely interactions with other lands took place since there are so many accounts of people arriving prior to the English. In some instances, there have been controversies or debates within the scientific community about specific archaeological findings. The voices of these critics have regrettably been overlooked.
Alternative theories were never popularised in Australia
The second point of focus used as evidence is the anthropological research which we have already touched on, the fact that Papua and Australia are separated by water and the notion that Aboriginals don't use boats.
Alternative theories have been formulated by scientists who have done their own studies on the matter but these were never popularised in Australia. Like the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, which found Indian and Mannan populations made contact with the Australian continent only a few thousand years ago, which have genetic links to the Aboriginal people of today.
Other points worthy of consideration come to the diary logs of Captain James Cook himself who employed the help of a man from Tahiti who showed that people of the Indian Ocean had already visited Australia and were already familiar with sea travel and the use of star navigation. This indicates that it's very possible tribes from the Indian Ocean didn't necessarily walk across Papua to Australia 50,000 years ago or 60,000 years ago. They very well could have traveled here by boat or raft only a few thousand years ago.
Recorded sightings of pre-existing pygmies in Australia
Professor Satish Kumar is currently serving as the Professor and Dean of School of Forensic Science at the National Forensic Science University in India. Upon many years of genetic testing and research, he concluded that there was, in fact, a genetic link between Aboriginals and Indian people. He claims the mitochondrial DNA shared between the m42 Haplogroups were found exclusively in pre-Dravidian Indians and Australian Aboriginals and nowhere else in the world. He believes that prior to the Aboriginals of Australia arriving a few thousand years ago that there were pygmy people.
With reference in the atlas of foreign countries, written between 265 and 316 AD, Chinese sea captains describe the mysterious Great South Land being inhabited by a race of 1-metre-tall pygmies.
Franken Alexander Jardine settled Cape York and recorded that they witnessed 1-metre-tall pygmies being hunted down like kangaroos by taller Aboriginals.
In the 1400s and 1500s, Dutch and Portuguese sailors sighting the Western Australian coastlines noted tall natives in warfare chasing and killing hordes of little native peoples.
There seem to be more than a few historical primary citations which mention a race of pygmies pre-existing Aboriginals and even being hunted down to extinction by the Aboriginals. It's very possible that the Aboriginals in Australia today are not native to the land and may have actually killed off the actual native indigenous pygmies of Australia.
Not only are there historical citations for this but there may even be archaeological evidence. There has been the discovery of ancient endocast skulls which have a different physiognomy, phenotypical skull shape to the Aboriginals.
Reliability of Aboriginal oral traditions
The third point of focus is perhaps the most redundant, but it seems to be the point that is taken most seriously by academics and politicians. This is the tradition of Aboriginal oral law. Aboriginals did not have any dating methods and they do not do any record keeping at all. Therefore, it is absurd to accept any timing or dates that they give as factual.
All accounts of the indigenous history rely on oral traditions and stories passed down through generations. The reliability of this type of evidence gets distorted and exaggerated with time and cannot be taken seriously.
Keith Wintershuttle - Fabrication of Aboriginal History
In the second part of this video, I want to focus on the fabrication of Aboriginal history the invention of their culture and the myth of there being an Aboriginal nation or a civilisation prior to Australia being settled by the British in 1788. I feel like this is a very important area of focus as much of the land rights issue as well as the idea of a voice to parliament stems from the idea that there was in fact a nation already existing in Australia which was apparently conquered and genocided by British invaders.
There has already been a great deal of work and research done into these topics by people like Keith Wintershuttle and the Honorable Arthur A Calwell who have written books on Australia's history and the fraud of Aboriginal history, as well as Sky News reporter Andrew Bolt who has been reporting on the exaggerations and distortions of Aboriginal history being used as an agenda of politically motivated people for over a decade.
Aboriginal people were never a nation upon the arrival of British settlers
When activists and politicians advocate for giving the Australian nation over to the Aboriginal people, it should be duly noted that Aboriginal people were never a nation upon the arrival of British settlers. Australia was only made up of about 500 different tribes, each with their own language and customs, who were often warring with each other over food and access to water.
Much of the land in Australia was uninhabited and not claimed by any particular tribe so when they talk about land rights treaty and handing over the nation of Australia to Aboriginal people, one should ask which Aboriginal people, as they were never unified as a people, and the concept of nationhood and naming cities was foreign to them.
You might notice how the leftwing government of Australia is talking about renaming a lot of our cities back to their so-called traditional Aboriginal names. There is no evidence that there was any cultural consensus over large geographical areas having any traditional names.
They may have had names for mountains and rivers and things like that, but how could they have a name for the exact geographical area of Brisbane, as an example, before Brisbane even existed and was built up into the city that it is today? It's impossible. Are we going to be led to believe that it just so happens that Meaanjin was the exact same place in area size as Brisbane before anything was ever built there? It's absurd.
Aboriginal people have never been a civilisation
The fact of the matter is that Aboriginal people have never been a civilisation. There is no evidence of agriculture or farming ever being used, which is the very basis of what a civilisation is. There was never a functioning alphabet, and no culture at all existed outside the very primitive hunter-gatherer nomadic lifestyles that they lived, as was expressly documented by the settlers and scientists who arrived in Australia.
It has never been proven that Aboriginals progressed past Stone Age technology, which was the prevailing opinion of National Geographic up until recent years.
Pauline Hanson, One Nation: ‘Labor loves that it was one of their very own who delivered the Stolen Generations apology. Kevin Rudd did the hard sell on the apology, telling the Australians it was necessary for us to move forward together as a nation. However, Anthony Albanesi has decided to turn us backward as two separate nations divided by race. That's the real end game. That's ultimately where the racist voice to parliament will take us. Labor is committed to implementing the Uluru Statement in full, so the voice is only the first step.
The next step is truth telling but Labor can't bring itself to tell the truth about its plans for the voice. Labor can't admit the truth that the elitist, out of touch Aboriginal industry which concocted the Uluru Statement, has for decades now been responsible for the failure to close the gap. Labor won't admit the truth that our uncounted billions of dollars the Aboriginal industry has stolen from taxpayers, has failed to help Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in the violence-plagued, economic and social dead ends we call remote communities.
The truth is, this industry is made up of thousands of corrupt and dysfunctional Aboriginal corporations and land councils. The truth is, these organisations are only interested in lining their own pockets and using their power to punch down on the truly disadvantaged aborigines they despise, and the few good people who are really trying to help them.’
Indigenous Protected Areas - No need for formal proof?
The issue of indigenous protected areas (IPA) runs parallel to the matter of land rights in Australia. IPA areas are considered culturally significant to Aboriginal people, with volunteers and Aboriginal led NGO’s determining their importance. In many cases, these areas are closed off to white people who do not identify as Aboriginal.
Unfortunately, the decision-making process relies solely on their word without the need of formal proof. Consequently, there have been instances where businesses were compelled to close due to a cultural significance claim basically anywhere they find a fishbone in the dirt, it can be considered a place of cultural significance. Appealing such declarations or seeking independent expert assessments is currently unavailable, leaving affected parties with limited recourse.
Racial land privatisation?
Presently, over 87 million hectares constituting 50% of Australia's national reserve system is designated as an IPA and further land acquisitions continue. With the potential empowerment of the Voice to Parliament and the Makarrata Treaty, concerns arise regarding the implications of what some view as a form of racial land privatisation. Recent government action includes an allocation of $231.5 million in additional funding for the IPA program from July 2023 to June 2028, in July of this year (2023).
(Initial Makarrata proposals put forward were for a treaty, covenant or convention which could include provision for matters such as: the protection of indigenous identity, language, law and culture. the recognition and restoration of rights to land.)
In July 2023 it was reported that tree planting work along the Canning River was halted after Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation demanded $2.5 million under the revamped Aboriginal Cultural Act in Western Australia.
(Note: Whadjuk Aboriginal Corporation CEO David Collard was later fired. Many rivers, creeks and other tributaries are now considered ethnographic sites, requiring the highest level of assessment to change.)
Bruce Pascoe - Dark Emu
The most famous example of inventing Aboriginal history and culture is none other than author Bruce Pascoe (pictured), an Australian writer and author who claims to be Aboriginal.
He has written over 30 books on Aboriginal pseudo history. It is essential to approach any historical work including Dark Emu, with critical thinking and an open mind when examining historical citations or their interpretations.
It's crucial to consider multiple sources of evidence, scholarly research, and peer-reviewed publications. Bruce didn't do any of that. He went into the topic with a political agenda and a historical bias, purposely misrepresenting evidence, sometimes even relying on fictitious work, and often resorting to gross exaggerations.
Sky News Outsiders: They defended him against accusations of falsely claiming indigenous heritage, even when Michael Mansell the chairman of the Aboriginal Land Council of Tasmania wrote last year: ‘For political reasons journalists of the left wanted to believe Pasco was genuine and put up the blinkers to any contrary view. Now they must eat humble pie and admit they got it all wrong.’
Sky News: The warning signs were there all along but the ABC refused to acknowledge them even when the warnings came from figures you'd think they would pay attention to. Former ABC journalist Kerry O'Brien last year: ‘It’s asserted in a critique in the monthly magazine that you regularly exaggerate and embellish the facts in Dark Emu. Such selective quoting creates an impression of societies with a sturdiness, permanence, sedentarism and technical sophistication that's not supported by the source material.’
World’s first bakers?
One of the claims Pascoe made is that Aboriginal people were the world's first bakers who harvested grain and seed and baked them into bread 15,000 years before the Egyptians did. His evidence for this? He cites what he believes are grindstones and the pushed over bales of grass mounds.
You would think that Aboriginal people who had a diet of very little carbohydrates would have continued this practice and that there would be an abundance of evidence to support it. Or maybe Bruce is misrepresenting the facts in order to spin a story and sell a book.
Excerpt from George Grey’s WA Expedition Journal, published in 1841
…The natives I had with me employed themselves in teaching the others, to whom flour was an unknown commodity, the art of making dampers; whilst Mr. Smith and myself, having arranged to start for Perth early the next morning, mixed with the groups and visited their fires; the little children now crawled to our feet and, all fear being laid aside, regarded our movements with the greatest curiosity.
Bruce Pascoe was even promoted heavily by the ABC and other media outlets for his work on Aboriginal history, culture, and agriculture until he was exposed as a fraud who made the whole thing up.
ABC Radio presenter quotes re Dark Emu
Michael Cathcart: Dark Emu, now this is a beautifully grounded history, a real game changer. Voiceover: Pre-colonial indigenous societies actually farmed the land and had a system of democracy which ensured peace across the continent.
Suzanne Hill: Was a thriving indigenous culture with technology settlements and agriculture.
Fran Kelly: Indigenous communities were so tied to the land. They built houses, they grew crops, they irrigated them. It's not the story that we are used to.
Jonathon Green: There are not many books that change the way people think, that actually shift ideas. Bruce Pasco's Dark Emu is one of those books.
State sponsored oppression and genocide of Aboriginal people
Critics like Andrew Bolt argue that Pascoe misinterpreted or exaggerated certain pieces of evidence to support his claims about Aboriginal agricultural practices. A significant PR campaign is promoting the notion that Australia's history is characterised by state sponsored oppression and genocide of Aboriginal people. This idea seems prevalent across social media, mainstream media and various written works which create a common narrative.
It is suggested that the Australian government sanctioned ethnic cleansing leading to the brutal murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent Aboriginal men women, and children, and some even claim the death toll to be in the millions even though there were never millions of Aboriginals living here. It is crucial to recognize that these assertions are not supported by historical evidence.
Respected historian Henry Reynolds, known for his left leaning perspectives, has estimated the number of Aboriginal deaths to be around 20,000:
“There can be no certainty about the indigenous death toll. Despite this problem, which is inherent, I decided in 1981 that I should try and give some estimates. I felt it was a responsibility of an historian who had studied this subject to try and arrive at some reasonable estimate of the numbers killed. I said it was reasonable to suppose that 20,000 Aborigines had died in conflict with the settlers. It was and remains an estimate but it was based on 10 years of research into history.”
Yet even he acknowledges that this estimation is based on a mathematical formula he devised lacking reliable historical citations.
Keith Windschuttle is an esteemed Australian historian renowned for his comprehensive series of lectures and publications on Aboriginal history, notably titled The Fabrication of Aboriginal History. Through meticulous research and analysis, Windschuttle challenges prevailing notions surrounding the concept of Aboriginal genocide, presenting evidence that disputes its veracity:
Keith Windschuttle: They show how deeply this version of history has now penetrated the wider culture. Our professional historians however, are the ones responsible for this because it's they who created the intellectual framework for these claims and have given them an aura of academic respectability. The ultimate statement of this outlook is the newly completed National Museum in Canberra whose architecture borrows a central theme from the Jewish Museum in Berlin built to commemorate the Holocaust.
Now I've also used these examples because despite the prominence and influence, they had not one of the points I've quoted from them here, as true. Take the incident at Risdon Cove (Tasmania). There were two separate reports from the British officers there at the time. Both said a settler and his wife had been surrounded in their hut and threatened by more than 200 Aboriginals. Soldiers from a nearby camp came to their rescue and shot, at most, three people. One of the reports said three natives were killed. The other said two were killed and one wounded.
Now these officers had no ostensible reason to lie or to downplay what happened. They were only doing their duty. However, at a government inquiry in 1830, a former convict testified that he thought ‘40 to 50 blacks had been killed…’ even though he admitted he had not been there at the time. Despite this claim being no more than a rumor 26 years after the event, it has allowed those historians who want to beat up this issue to say witnesses have claimed up to 50 Aborigines were killed.
Hence, when translated into the wider culture, a defensive action with three adult casualties has become a massacre of 50 innocent men women and children. And the Wall Street journalist claim that the bodies were salted down and sent to Sydney for anthropological investigation is another rumor first made in 1830 that had no contemporary corroboration.
We can be even more certain about the Bells Falls Massacre of the 1820s. This is a complete fabrication. There is no contemporary evidence to support it of any kind. In fact, the first reports of this event did not appear in print until 1962. That is 120 years later when an article in The Times by a local amateur historian reported it as one of the oral legends of the district. Even though the story was nothing more than a folk myth, this did not stop it being taken up and reproduced in two 1988 books, Blood on the Wattle by the journalist Bruce Elder and Six Australian Battlefields by the noted scholar Al Grassby.
Additional information re Bells Falls Gorge
March 3, 2003 letter excerpt from Keith Windschuttle to Ruth Ashe, National Museum of Australia Review secretariat, Department of Communications, Information Technology and the Arts:
1823-1825 Wiradjuri War
In the articles listed above I have complained that the centerpiece of the Contested Frontiers exhibit, a photograph of Bells Falls Gorge which implies that many Aborigines were killed at this site in the 1820s, is grossly misleading since there is no contemporary evidence that anyone was killed there at the time. The “Bells Falls Gorge Massacre” derives from mythology rather than history. All the “evidence” about this incident is based on oral tales told in the twentieth century.
I would like to add now that this exhibit is also misleading in asserting that there was such a thing as a “Wiradjuri War” or “Wiradjuri country” in 1823-1825. This is because there was no group of Aborigines known as the Wiradjuri in existence in the 1820s. The term “Wiradjuri” does not derive from Aboriginal culture. It was invented by the white anthropologist John Fraser in the 1890s.
Keith Windschuttle: In 1989 Mary Coe's book Windradyne, a Wiradjuri Koorie, published by the Aboriginal Studies Press, claimed this story as part of ancient Aboriginal tradition and the film I mentioned for school children about this, is from this book.
The Event at Forest River in 1926, described by Ben Keenan as one of the hundreds of massacres that took place in the 20th century has more plausibility.
A royal commission found that two police, while on the hunt for an Aboriginal who had murdered a pastoralist, had themselves shot 11 natives in their custody and burnt their remains beyond recognition. Until recently, historians had no good reasons to doubt their findings. However, in 1999, the Perth journalist Rod Moran in his book Massacre Myth, published a detailed analysis of the evidence to the Royal Commission and proved beyond reasonable doubt that no such killings ever took place. There were no eyewitnesses, no forensic evidence of human beings killed and no ballistic evidence, no bullets.
Moran produced a medical officer’s analysis made at the time and largely ignored by later commentators, that charred bones found at some campsites were not of human origin or were of indeterminate origin. They were probably the remains of animals cooked over campfires.
The figure 100 dead at Forest River cited by both Ben Keirnan and Henry Reynolds comes from Aboriginal oral history collected in the 1970s. That is 50 years later. However, the man whose observations the West Australian Museum claims to be those of a survivor, was never at Forest River in this period.
Moran shows that to burn a human body beyond recognition in the open air would require an average of 2 and 1/2 tons of wood per person. To destroy 100 bodies, the two police at Forest River would have had to collect 250 tons of wood in country when you look at photographs of it is almost desert.
The total number of violent deaths cited by Philip Knightley, that is between 50 and 100,000, is another case of pure invention. The only authority to suggest a total this high, is the book Blood on the Wattle by Bruce Elder, a journalist whose normal specialty is rock and roll music.
A more accurate understanding
Keith Windschuttle’s work critically examines the alleged invention and myths associated with this topic, aiming to provide a more accurate understanding of the historical events that unfolded upon the arrival of settlers in 1788.
Windschuttle challenges the claim that there was a deliberate and systemic genocide of the Aboriginal population during the British colonisation of Australia. He argues while there were instances of violence in conflict, it went both ways, and it was not a coordinated effort to exterminate the Aboriginal people.
An article published by The Quadrant delves into the narratives surrounding Aboriginal genocide which have been frequently employed by Aboriginal Advocates during truthtelling ceremonies and publications.
The article highlights several instances where historical events have been subject to misrepresentation and mythologization. While a comprehensive review of each claim is beyond the scope of this summary, it is absolutely evident that certain purported massacres have been tracked down to fictional literature or exaggerated accounts transmitted through oral Aboriginal tradition.
Conclusion
In this video, we delved into the complexity surrounding Australia's historical narratives, particularly those concerning alleged genocide. An earnest look into this topic reveals a deliberate endeavor to manipulate Aboriginal history, seemingly driven by political motives with intentions to discredit the nation of Australia itself.
A lot of this stems back to an underlying communist agenda, which I have addressed in previous videos. A lot more could be said on this topic, which I will refer you all to the reading Keith Windschuttle’s book The Fabrication of Aboriginal History. I suggest all of your out there give it a read.
Thank you all for watching this video.
Recommended Viewing: They are using 'events' to justify tyranny in Australia
Until next time.
Warumpi Band - Blackfella Whitefella (Released 1985)
Blackfella, whitefella
It doesn't matter what your color
As long as you a real fella
As long as you a true fella
All the people of different races
With different lives in different places
It doesn't matter what your name is
We got to have lots of changes
We need more brothers if we're to make it
We need more sisters if we're to save it
Are you the one who's gonna stand up and be counted?
Are you the one who's gonna be there when we shout it?
Are you the one who's always ready with a helping hand?
Are you the one who understands this family plan?