Say NO CONSENT Albo's corrupt 'rammed' WEF-UN Digital ID (slavery) Bill
Silence in the hoodwink world of legalese means that you consent. ‘No Consent’ is the correct wording, as it clearly reflects No Contract, No Joinder and No Jurisdiction.
The WEF-Senate voted to ‘ram’ the Digital ID Bill 2023 through the Senate without debate on 27 March 2024. 33 voted Yes (freemason degree), 26 voted No.
Editor’s Note: Fear not. Bullying, corrupted, luciferian WEF governments that fail to represent the best interests of the people are on their way out, but that doesn’t mean we can become complacent. Just say No Consent. Silence is interpreted as acquiescence, or passive consent.
CAIRNS NEWS - Jim O’Toole, Townsville Bureau
DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE MARXIST DIGITAL ID
Five independents plus two other senators could have stopped it. The bill will be railroaded through the Lower House when parliament resumes on April 30. Labor has the numbers.
Eight Liberal senators, seven Labor and independent Lidia Thorpe did not vote so we can only assume they were paired and did not need to.
Independents Jacqui Lambie, Tammy Tyrell, Lidia Thorpe, David Van and David Pocock could have voted against this terrible travesty… Instead Thorpe jumped in with Labor pairing to support the bill. The other ‘faulty four’ independents supported more mayhem that is to come.
The Greens have shown their hand yet again by representing the WEF and UN globalism…Ask Greens and independent senators who voted for this consequential bill what bribes they got from Labor and let them know the substantial Freedom Movement media will campaign against them between now and the next election. Give them an earful at Canberra
Liberal National senators paired with Labor
Simon Birmingham
Sarah Henderson
Hollie Hughes
Maria Kovacic
Bridget McKenzie
James Paterson
Linda Reynolds
Dev Sharma
Labor/Ind pairs
Don Farrell
Katie Gallagher
Jen McAllister
Barbara McCarthy
Deb O’Neill
Lidia Thorpe Ind
Murray Watt
Penny Wong
There is a vacant senate position in Victoria which makes up the total of 76 senators.
Cairns News Article: Eight Labor senators and eight Liberals paired, did not vote, Digital ID passes on party lines
NO CONSENT CAMPAIGN
South Australia's Tim Dwyer is calling for political civil disobedience in the wake of the WEF-Albanese government's unlawful decision to 'ram' through the communist digital ID without debate.
He is advising all Australians to drop into their Federal MPs office Tuesday 2nd April & Wednesday 3rd April and hand them a signed piece of paper that says:
No Digital ID Without Consent
No Debate = Not Lawful
No Consent
And leave it there.
’NO CONSENT’ IS CORRECT WORDING
Anyone who tells you to say ‘I Do Not Consent’ is giving incorrect guidance. I was advised a couple of years ago by a helpful legal guide that ‘No Consent’ is the correct wording.
Notes:
Silence in the hoodwink world of legalese means that you consent. The term ‘I do' means ‘consent’. I/Aye means Yes. Not/Knot means something which Joins/Binds.
‘No Consent’ is the correct wording to use, as it clearly reflects No Contract, No Joinder and No Jurisdiction.
Image source Tim’s Truth - Rumble: There NOW Must Be Political Civil Disobedience By All Good People
Article: Misguided freemasons believe you can live forever by sexually vampirising children
Includes Australian Who’s Who of Alleged Freemasons - Jackie Lambie, Senator for Tasmania; NSW Parliament, every Minister; QLD Parliament, every Minister; Kerry Chant, NSW Chief Health Officer; Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia; Alex Hawke, Liberal Party MP (to name a few).
Former freemason Dr Selwyn Stevens has revealed that Australia per capita, has more Freemasons than anywhere else on the planet and that many health issues in families are to do with the part of the degree that their father or grandfather was in the lodge.
Australian Mafia Council
The Australian government’s Digital ID Bill media release dated 30 November 2023, bears the usual keeping you safe hallmarks - reminiscent of safe and effective experimental mRNA bio-jabs masquerading as vaccines.
But when you read about the unreported origins of the One World Government concept, check out the World Economic Forum’s ridiculous transhumanistic eat ze bugs vision of our future world and WEF China’s austere, digital surveillance ID in action, I hope you feel the need to question why a handful of political doormats voted to ‘ram’ through this bill instead of open it up to debate - not just in parliament, but in the wider mass media - particularly the idiot box realm.
Brief overview of the One World Government origins
(You may need to sit down):
18th May, 1967 - Texas oil billionaire Nelson Bunker Hunt, using a sophisticated satellite technique to detect global deposits, discovers a huge oil source south of New Zealand in the Great South Basin.
10th May, 1968 - Onassis crowned head of the Mafia; Colby (head of CIA covert operations in S.E. Asia) ran the Onassis heroin operations in the Golden Triangle (Laos, Burma, Thailand) with 200 Green Beret mercenaries - i.e. the Phoenix Programme.
Early 1969 - Mafia consolidates its banking operations; David Rockefeller becomes Chairman of Chase Manhattan
October 1969 - Chase Manhattan begins new operation in Australia with National Bank Australasia and A.C. Goods Associates - Chase -NBA.
17th February 1970 - Gerald Parsky sets up a new heroin-dollar laundry in Australia - Australian International Finance Corp - using the Irving Trust Co. New York.
April 1970 - Onassis, Rockefeller and the Seven Sisters begin setting up the shadow World Government using the Illuminati-controlled banks and the transnational corporations. In Melbourne they set up the Australian International Finance Corporation
Early 1971 - Onassis and Rockefeller begin global operation to buy influence for the One World Government concept.
Let’s get a conversation started
Read all about the secret Australian Mafia Council and how Rupert Murdoch and other decrepit rich men played pivotal roles in undermining and ultimately ruining Australia.
Albanese Government Digital ID Media Release 30 November 2023
The Albanese Government has introduced new legislation in the Senate today to strengthen and expand Australia’s Digital ID System.
Digital ID is a secure, convenient, voluntary, and inclusive way for Australians to verify their ID online. Digital ID is not a card, it’s not a unique number, and it’s not a new form of ID.
Digital ID allows people to verify their ID when interacting online without having to repeatedly provide copies of their most sensitive documents, such as passports, birth certificates and driver licences.
The Government is investing $145.5 million to support the Digital ID system and to implement independent regulation and oversight of the system.
The Digital ID Bill will put in place the legislative framework to create an economy-wide Digital ID system in Australia.
The Bill will strengthen an Accreditation Scheme for Digital ID service providers and enable the expansion of the Australian Government Digital ID System to states and territories and, in time, the private sector.
The Minister for Finance, Senator Katy Gallagher, said the government’s vision is for a national, economy-wide Digital ID system, that allows Australians to do the things they need to do online, more easily and securely.
The Attorney-General, Mark Dreyfus, said the Government’s approach strikes the right balance between convenience and maintaining strong standards of privacy and security.
"Australians rightly expect greater protections, transparency, and control over their personal information when they provide it to trusted organisations," Mr Dreyfus said.
The Assistant Treasurer, Stephen Jones, said Digital ID is the safer way for Australians to prove who they are online.
“Whether it’s thwarting a scammer who is pretending to be your bank or securing your online tax accounts so criminals cannot access it. Digital ID will help secure Australians money and their information.”
Read full media release here: Strengthening Australia’s Digital ID System
Further information on the Digital ID: www.digitalidentity.gov.au
Until next time.
Actions speak louder than words in not allowing a debate to take place. I guess after being caught lying with "it's "ONLY" One Page debacle didn't want to risk being caught lying again.
So much for fill in the petitions voicing concerns and objections and the whole they work for us.
So where to from here?