Crime News: Australian Land Title Theft & Digital ID Racket
Also, why a One World Government will have no authority and the 1601 Act that renamed workers and children sold as sex slaves, 'Apprentices'
If it feels like history keeps going around in circles and repeating itself, it’s because it is. For the last time, according to various esoteric scholars and commentators.
I am reminded of ex-satanic priest Mark Passio’s words:
‘The cults can’t create, they lost this when they sold their souls. So the same satanic playbook of dictatorship and mind control is repeated century after century, until now. Finally we are at tipping point, with enough souls transcending the matrix and breaking down the programming of our greatest collective fears.’
How the landless poor people came to be
This article travels back to 1535 where it all began for England’s ‘landless poor’. Similar to the dodgy state of affairs in Australia, whereby in recent years, land titles have been stolen from unsuspecting property owners by their own masonic government that serves the luciferian/satanic unelected ruling bloodlines that privately own anti-humanity institutions like the United Nations, World Health Organisation and World Economic Forum.
Historical Facts I Never Learned at School
In 1535 King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”.
In 1545, King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome.
And lest we forget the act introduced in 1601 under Queen Elizabeth 1’s reign, which renamed workers and children sold as sex slaves as ‘Apprentices’.
(Seize means ‘take by force’. Sound familiar?)
The unlawful road from Freehold to Leasehold
A land title is a legal document that proves ownership of a piece of land and grants the owner exclusive use and possession of the property. Unbeknownst to many Australian property owners, their title deeds have been stolen and replaced with digital certificates and the language has also allegedly changed from ‘freehold’ to leasehold’.
Leasehold means you own your property with the government and they can mandate things like smart meters and put native title liens on properties despite the fact Australians in a federal Referendum voted no against the Voice to Parliament referendum. The rogue government is bulldozing past the people regardless, this time, state to state.
Post 2020, land values have also risen to ridiculous heights and property owners are being hit with monstrous land tax bills, despite being victims of land title theft by their own government.
It appears that Australian politicians, most of whom are Luciferian-worshipping Freemasons, blatantly serve elitist vacuum cleaners who are most likely descendants of the original land thieves. The usual suspects.
Article: Misguided Freemasons believe you can live forever by sexually vampirising children.
Unlawful MyGov Real Estate theft Stealing your properties Australians wake up
July 31, 2023 - Rod Culleton - Great Australian Party (16 mins)
‘The corporate fraud governments of Australia are stealing everyone’s land. Rod is showing what you MUST do to reclaim your land title so they cannot delete it and thieve it. Banks disposed your Title? Criminal Code Act Compilation Act 1913 (WA) Criminal Code Acts are similar in each State and Territory.’
Aspiring Australian political candidate Nicola Charles exposes Australia’s land title theft crime of the century
Nicola Charles was interviewed on Freedom Train International (FTI) in August 2024 and exposed the Australian corporate government’s secret theft of ALL land titles. If you own a property/properties outright or are paying a mortgage, please read the following notes, watch the interview and contact your local MP for advice about how they intend to restore your land title/s.
Also, when you read my notes about governments operating under contract law, ask them how they intend to justify enormous land taxes on overpriced land when the lawful owner chooses not to accept the government’s contract? And any other parasitical taxes, for that matter.
In my view, if multi million/billion/trillion dollar corporations pay minimal or no tax in Australia, why should we, the people pay any tax? Government corporations operate under contract law and have no jurisdiction over us.
I, for one, will not allow obedient political servants to a greed-stricken, luciferian/satanic UN cult to turn us all into landless paupers trapped in a ridiculous, transhumanist digital ID system that can monitor and control our every move. Get a life, people!
Knowledge is power when we understand it and apply it.
FTI Transcript Notes
Nicola Charles: The UNiparty, which is Labor and Liberal… has stolen everyone's homes and properties in Australia.
The first thing they did was instruct banks and solicitors to take a big stamp that says destroyed - no longer legal and stamp out all of the paper parchment title deeds. Your parchment paper is a valuable document because you've got the same rights on the land that the Crown had. It’s like a continued title through everyone that's owned it, and you have the same rights and privileges on your freehold land as the crown had when they sold it to you.
This is the biggest heist - the theft of other people's property - I’ve ever seen. 100% of Australian parchment paper title deeds were canceled and the title deeds and lands office were sold to an Australian super fund - corporations and big business.
It actually goes so far that it can prevent a person from leaving that land or home to their children. That’s what they've done. You've all heard of the great taking…it's almost like the great illusionists of old from the 18th century. They have you looking over here at this pandemic which we now know, thanks to the Senate hearings in America, was man-made, while over here, they're making all these changes financially and destroying people's lives. And they haven't come out to speak about it. They haven't denied it.
On paper, Australians have had their homes and land stolen from them and most of them still don't know because they've got them tied up with reality television stars and what's happening at the footy. It’s the Great Theft. They've been robbed blind right under their noses. It's absolutely revolting. These globalists are stealing people's wealth.
We've got a building called Australian Government which is basically a UN (United Nations) building, and what they call Old Parliament House is closed. It's not old Parliament House, it's your Parliament House and they pimp it out for birthday parties and conferences and stuff like that.
Honestly, what these people have gotten away with for such a long time is very, very distressing and all of the Australians watching this who think you're safe and sound, and they always say, ‘Oh no, I've got my paper parchment squared away. It's in my safe at home. Mine's all good.’
No mate, yours is cancelled like everyone else’s is. So, this is something people really need to look into and think about.
Our Commonwealth Parliament is a tourist attraction
We've got so many problems going on down here. They want to call an early election and the reason is, people are waking up at this geometric rate and if they understand that they don't have to vote back in these corporate guys working for the corporation, what we want to do is the restoration of the Commonwealth - open the Commonwealth Parliament - because it's closed right now. It's a tourist attraction.
I got a phone call from a constitutional barrister who said, ‘Listen, I just want to say to you, you keep going girl because you're bang on the money. And let me tell you, one of the best things you ever said publicly was that Anthony Albanese isn't the prime minister of anywhere and you're absolutely correct. I see you've gone on and said that in speeches again. Under law, if you've said that publicly two or three times and it hasn't been refuted, that's because it's the truth.
Corporate governments are out of jurisdiction
Nicola Charles: We have no, non-corporate Australian government and in a note in their own act underneath, it says, ‘All corporate arms of the Australian government are legally separate from the Commonwealth.’
So that's the Commonwealth absolving itself of all responsibility for the actions of this corporate government, and I'm sorry, that can't stand. And what that also means is if they're legally separate from the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth is us, the common people, we don't have to listen to a word these corporate governments say. They are out of jurisdiction and… you can tell when they swear their oaths.
Digital ID MP Katy Gallagher acted unlawfully
The MP Katy Gallagher, who brought the Digital Identity Bill to the Senate floor in Australia, didn't swear her correct oath. I've publicized it. People are emailing me left and right that she didn't swear her oath to the Commonwealth, to the common people. She swore it to the corporation. Well, that's fine, but you don't have jurisdiction over the people. And she also doesn't have a lawful right to take her seat in the Senate without that oath. And she didn't take it.
Gallagher also brought that Digital Identity Bill to the floor and then announced that there would be no lawful, democratic debate by elected senators, that the bill was just going to get pushed through. That again is unlawful. So we're being bulldozed by… what I consider to be corporate criminals. This is a heist. It's not a conspiracy theory. When you're canceling people's freeholds, turning them into leaseholds and not telling them about it, what would you call that, Jim? It's like highway robbery.
Host, Jim Ferguson: It is highway robbery. These guys are out of control and I think you made a good point - do politicians have a gun at their head? Well I think probably they're blackmailed, a lot of them, and bribed. I think there's a lot of corruption involved.
I think that's how the globalists operate. They identify somebody that could be of use to them, and they will give them incentives. They will take them in like a cult. They will love them, get them elected and then they get them to… maybe take a little bit of cocaine, some alcohol and then they film them. What they're doing, and I think that's probably a large part of what's going on, once they get sucked into that, it’s very hard for them to get out of it and then of course there could be, literally, guns at their heads at some future point if they don't behave or get back in line…
Nicola Charles: You need to understand, that because of human rights laws… constitutions, the Magna Carta and bills of rights, the only way they can engineer a One World Government is using corporate contract law. And that's why they're trying to bring people - with this whole trans and woke agenda - out of being man-woman because then they can govern them because they're a fellow corporation. The way they've done this is with corporate contract law. Now, this is very important. This would be the same in the UK as it is in Australia.
A mandate doesn't apply until you agree
Nicola Charles: There are a couple of things under law - that is your silent acquiescence (passive consent) to them becoming your master and you becoming their slave. I know that's strong language. One of those aspects under law is a mandate because a mandate isn't a law. A mandate doesn't apply until you agree. So this is very dangerous territory for people who were mandated to get those shots in the COVID-19 pandemic.
If you complied and under a mandate, got those shots, you are strike one in - you are halfway to a contract with your corporate One World Government. Once you comply to a second mandate by that corporation, the deal is done. You have signed your silent contract with a corporation to govern you and they have mastery over you and you need to understand that. These are very difficult aspects of law but this is what they're trying to do.
But the number one biggest contract you can ever make with this corporation, which means they do have rights and power over you and you will lose your human rights, is digital identity, and that's why they're trying to do it.
Beware the ‘Wokeism’ deception - or lose your human rights
Nicola Charles: A politician is a public servant. They're not serving the public. They’re running agendas for somebody else and using corporate contract law. That’s what they're doing in Australia… and did you know that they're trying to get human beings out of their status as man and woman? That's what all these woke agendas are about; that's what identifying as something else is about. This is wokeism.
If a court sees you as a man or woman, then you are present in court, but if the law sees you as a corporation, then a corporation makes an appearance in court. And guess what? A corporation doesn't have human rights, so what they're trying to do is get as many people as possible, and they say - Oh you can change your passport and your driver's license and your birth certificate, you can be a man one minute and a woman the next and you can identify as a cat and meow - and everyone has to go along with it. Once you've made that decision, once you've made that legal jump, and you are no longer a man or a woman, you've lost your human rights.
So this is the very clever and devious thing that they've done, Jim. While they're banging on with all this virtue signaling that they are defending the rights of minority groups like trans individuals, what they're actually trying to do is take your rights away from you because as soon as they can get you out of man-woman law and into corporate contract law, you can never win. (Note: This is not entirely true. See my note below about the process of declining to enter into a contract with a criminal government corporation.)
You must vote in English if you want a commonwealth government
Nicola Charles: When you vote for the corporate guys in this rush-through election that's coming, and you vote for anyone who's got capital SURNAME or Capital FULL NAME, you are voting for a guy who represents the corporation. You must vote in English if you want a commonwealth government and that is…. Big N for Nicola and then small letters.
These are things that people don't understand… the Australians in particular don't understand this stuff because ignorance is no defense under the law. So oops, too bad, so sad, guess who's your new boss?
I think it's clear that we the 99% - the common man and woman, governed we thought, under the Commonwealth, need to know the truth or at least as much truth not a story not like Klaus (Schwab) says, weaving a narrative. That’s a story, Klaus. I'm a writer. Weaving a narrative is telling someone a story. I'm done with story time for 5-year-olds. That's why I'm trying to get into politics in Australia.’
Source: Freedom Train International August 17, 2024 (Run time: 54 mins): Breaking Exclusive: Shocking news emerges that Australians have been robbed by their own Government!
Contract Law
Why the Australian Government doesn’t have any Authority - nor will the proposed One World Government
‘The Australian government’s leading solicitors have said that the Commonwealth and the States are corporations. They are operating as any other corporation and they contract with you. Taxation is a contract. Once you agree, you are in contract. But the unfair conditions of the contract allow you to step out. You are not breaking any laws.’
Tim Dwyer, Our True Australia
The following passages briefly explain how the Australian government operates within Contract Law and why it cannot force people into contract or servitude:
The government is a corporation that has no authority apart from that which you think it has.
Australian Consumer Law (ACL) is the law of the Commonwealth. In ACL, everything is contract. Under Contract Law, you cannot be forced into contract or servitude.
When you are dealing with the Commonwealth, every aspect of your interaction, as per any other corporation, is a contract. If you choose not to contract, you cannot be forced into contract.
Given that everything you do must be contracted, you get to choose if you want to contract with them. Why do you want to buy a license to drive a motor car? Why do you pay rates? Why do you want to enter into all these contracts?
When they send you a fine in the mail, they are offering to contract with you.
The government’s leading solicitors have said that the Commonwealth and the States are corporations. They are operating as any other corporation and they contract with you. You can step out. You do not have to play their game. If we all stopped contracting, what would they do?
Taxation is a contract. Once we agree, we are in contract. But you can step out because the unfair conditions of contract allow you to step out. You are not breaking any laws.
What we have seen happen in Australia since 2020 has been an absolute gross breach of contract. Even though the government has stepped outside our Constitution, the Constitution still stands. The Constitution says it is a Deed of Trust between the people and those we elect. A Trustee. It’s a contract.
They have breached the Trust. Under Trust Law, they are in serious trouble. Under Constitutional Law, if they are found guilty, they must be hung by the neck until they are dead.
We have been sold down the river. We have been educated to believe the government cares about us.
In 1966, they took our silver from us.
In 1973, they (Whitlam Government) took the Great Seal out of our Constitution.
In 1976, they (Fraser Government) took the Letters Patent out.
In 1978, they (Fraser Government) took the Constitution out of schools because they didn’t want us to know our rights.
In 1986, Bob Hawke unlawfully introduced the Australia Act. He introduced the Local Government Act straight after the referendum that said, no, we didn’t want the Local Governments to be a third tier of Government. He was a Fabian Socialist.
Recommended viewing & reading:
Video (9 mins): Tim’s Truth: It’s All Contract Law. The Government Doesn’t Have Any Authority
Article: Australians hit with Land Tax bills, despite being victims of Land Title theft
Australia The Concealed Colony (banned) book link: https://archive.org/stream/AustraliaConcealedColony1/AustraliaConcealedColony1_djvu.txt
Canon 3352
Since 1990, under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass, has become an international system.
Canon of Positive Law
The industrial era of England was my most unfavourite subject at high school because there was so much suffering, squalor and poverty inflicted upon the commoners. Fast forward to 2025 and I can’t get enough of Frank O'Collins’ Canon of Positive Law which essentially explores how modern legal structures have been potentially corrupted over time, particularly in the context of property, trusts, and the financial system.
I first learned of his work in an article about the origins of Birth Certificates called Baby Slave Trade by Anna Von Reitz (2018):
‘This is all 100% anti-scriptural Satanic nonsense which the British Monarchs have promoted for their own profit for going on five hundred years, and which they have immorally and illegally foisted off on the people of this country and the rest of the world, too.’ Anna Von Reitz
Canon of Positive Law Overview
The Canon of Positive Law includes several key articles that address the legal and financial systems, particularly focusing on the concept of necessity and duress.
One of the notable articles is Article 113 of the Canons of Positive Law, which states:
"Necessity is the unavoidable requirement of a Party to consent, act or perform in a manner that they would not otherwise do if not for the presence of some clear need, threat, coercion, danger or risk. Hence, any oath, vow, sign or seal given under Necessity has no legal validity or value."
This article emphasises that any legal action or agreement made under duress or necessity is not valid. This principle is crucial in challenging the legal system's ability to enforce agreements or actions that were not made freely and voluntarily.
Another important concept in O'Collins' work is the idea that the law is fundamentally a system of bonding and securitization, derived from the Latin 'cautio', meaning to bond, to securitize, and to bail. According to O'Collins, the law is not based on common law as traditionally understood but is instead a financial and legal mechanism designed to create and manage value through oaths and agreements.
O'Collins also discusses the significance of the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll (EDP), which is a legal document that individuals can use to assert their rights and sovereignty. The EDP is based on the principle that a person's word, or oath, is their bond, and it can be used to challenge the legal system's claims of authority over an individual.
(Source: Brave AI)
"Although our philosophers often seek to use the term positive to demarcate specifically human law, the term and concept are not well suited to do so. All of divine law is positive in source, and much of it is positive in content...."
James Bernard Murphy, The philosophy of positive law: foundations of jurisprudence.
The following selected Canons (laws/rules) featured in Baby Slave Trade by Anna Von Reitz:
Canon 3351
King Henry VIII. Lowlight: Seized properties of the poor and common farmers; reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome (Image source: Artuk)
In terms of the history of Birth Certificates, Settlement Certificates and diminishing, tricking, deceiving, lying, seizing, condemning and cursing free people as slaves, wards, infants, cattle, poor and commodities:
(i) In 1535 (27 Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers under the pretext they were “small religious estates”.
By 1539 (31 Hen.8 c.13), he did the same for large religious estates.
By 1540, (32 Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non-wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.
Then in 1545, (37 Hen.8 c.1), King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves.
The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continued into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates; and
Edward VI. Lowlight: Slaves could be branded, sold or exterminated (Image source: Wiki)
(ii) In 1547 (1 Ed.6 c.3), Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work.
All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts), now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated.
The only exception to the rule, were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters. This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3 & 4 Ed.6 c.16).
However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14 El. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force; and
Queen Elizabeth I in her later years. Lowlight: The ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled; a new Act renamed children sold as sex slaves and workers as “Apprentices”; introduced “Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners (Image source: Wiki)
(iii) Under Queen Elizabeth I of England, a set of measures was introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers.
In 1589 (31 El c.7) peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord's land was considered a "right". As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or "paupers" swelled as available to be press-ganged into work; and
(iv) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced in 1601 (43 El. c.2 and “secret version” as 43 El. c.3) to begin to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish, and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”.
Thus, the Apprenticeship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the Non-Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce. The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes called the "Poor Rates" (now called "council taxes") against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves. This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later; and
Charles II. Lowlights: No one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”; people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for profit; invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy. (Image source: Wiki)
(v) Under Charles II of England, the concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined in 1662 (14 Car.2 c.12) including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document. A child's birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.
However, from the age of 7 upward, the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”. The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor, the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year. The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and
(vi) Under the draconian and morally repugnant dictates of 1662 (14 Car.2 c.12), no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”. If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers).
From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper. As a result of the examination, the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and
(vii) In 1667 (19 Car.2 c.4) the concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England. This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy.
Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and
(viii) The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable, and a new act was required in 1670 (22Car.2 c.18) to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown; and
James II. Lowlight: Perpetual “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates (Image source: Artuk)
(ix) Previous acts were continued, and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II in 1685 (1J.2. c. 17) as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign; and
William and Mary of Orange. Lowlights: Making more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” had to be worn at all times; rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices” by business owners (Image Source: History Extra)
(x) Under William and Mary of Orange in 1691 (3W&M c.11), the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations; and
(xi) In 1697 (3W&M. c.11), one of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) of the “badge” of the poor with the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.
Furthermore, all evidence as to “Jewish Badges” being introduced in Europe as early as the 13th Century is wholly and completely false, as the term “jew” was not revived until the 16th Century. Instead, the first examples of badges as a stigma to status, is most likely this act and subsequent acts against the poor by banking and ruling elite who chose to identify themselves as members of the same non-Christian religion invented in the 16th Century that claimed to be victims of the same barbarity.
The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as "P" (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon) used today; and
(xii) In 1698 (9&10W3 c.11) an act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more, making at the time more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor”; and
(xiii) In 1713 (12Ann. S.2 c.18), the extension of Settlement Certificates as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby (§2) those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation; and
(xiv) Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in 1722 a new law was passed (9Geo.1 c.7) in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.
Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”.
(xv) In 1733 (6Geo.2 c.32), one of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.
Thus, the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society; and
(xvi) In 1761 (2Geo.3 c.22), Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies.
This was further reinforced with the act in 1767 (7Geo.3 c.39) that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”; and
(xvii) Beginning in 1773 with the Inclosure Act 1773 (13Geo.3 c.81), followed by the Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 (41Geo.3 c.109), English Parliament effectively "privatized" massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become "landless paupers" and therefore in need of parish assistance.
General George Washington (Image source: Wiki)
In America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the "War of Independence". Almost the entire Patriot militia were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwallis of the East India Company Red Army. (Note: I have been unable to corroborate this alleged ‘deal’. ) The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and
(xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) (5&6Will.4 c.76) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison.
Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacrilegious framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act).
Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked "to death"; and
(xix) In 1836, the Births and Deaths Registration Act (1836) (6&7Will.4 c.86) was introduced which for the first time created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.
Thus on 1, July 1837, the Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all "paupers" disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful ("voluntary") slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today; and
(xx) Beginning from 1871, further historic changes in the administration of “vital statistics” such as birth certificates and death certificates with the introduction of health districts or “sanitary districts”. The Local Government Act of 1871 (34&35Vict. c.70), Public Health Act 1872 (35&36Vict. c.79) and in 1874 (37&38Vict. c.89) and the Public Health Act 1875 (38&39Vict. c.55) created a system of “districts” called Sanitary Districts governed by a Sanitary Authority responsible for various public health matters including mental health legally known as “sanity”.
Two types of Sanitary Districts were created being Urban and Rural. While the sanitary districts were “abolished” in 1894 with the Local Government Act of 1894 (57&58Vict. c.73), the administration of the “poor” is still maintained in part under the concept of district health boards of Guardians including magistrates and other “Justices of the Peace”; and
(xxi) In 1948, the National Assistance Act (11&12Geo.6 c.29) was introduced and supposed to abolish the Poor Laws. However, many of the most draconian poor law acts were not repealed or abolished as evidenced by the tables of repealed acts that miss key acts, otherwise remaining with full force and effect.
Canon 3352
Since 1990 under the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the system of issuing birth certificates as proof of a man or woman being a permanent member of the underclass has become an international system.
Canon 3353
In respect of the adoption of the multiple functions of the use of the information and generic form of a Birth Certificate within present Western Roman Systems:
(i) Whilst the same general form and extracted information almost exactly the same as a Birth Certificate may be used (eg a Bond, or other form of Security), unless it is officially “titled” a “Birth Certificate” it is not therefore a “Birth Certificate”; and
(ii) There is no evidence that Bonds using the same information derived from the birth register information uses the title “Birth Certificate” (when it is most likely the term Bond is used). Therefore, any presumptions that precisely the same certificate is used for creating bonds is a gross error, when in fact the real question is the use of the information; and
(iii) Ignorance in presuming the precise same form of a Birth Certificate is used in all cases of applying the information is a major contributor to permitting “plausible deniability” as to the use or misuse of such information by governments.
Canon 3354
In respect of the adoption of the Admiralty term “Birth” in relation to newborns:
(i) The historic record of Statutes of Westminster are a highly unreliable indicator as to the origin of use of the word “Birth” in substitute for historic more ancient and more common terms in the English language such as nascence (from Latin nasci being “born”), or filial, or kin or born. In fact, the majority of European languages with poignant exception to English, continue the tradition of using words descended from nasci to indicate the arrival of a new born; and
(ii) Westminster statutes indicate the term Birth being used to describe newborns by the early 1700’s. However, this should be discounted as almost certainly examples of deliberate fraud and corruption. Instead, the most likely introduction of the term Birth, to distinguish from Berth is by early 1800’s such as (6&7Will.4 c.86) following the transfer of control of the registration of all “vessels” to Admiralty in 1795 (35Geo.3 c.58) and reinforced in 1813 (54Geo.3 c.151) and 1823 with (4Geo.4 c.41). Unquote.
Recommendations from Anna Von Reitz:
If you agree that it is time to put an end to any and all institutions that condone these practices, join me in making this information go viral. Discuss it with your Church groups and local assemblies, your Synagogues and schools, your Mosques and your fraternal organizations, your Chambers of Commerce, your hospital administrators, your friends and family in the military, everyone, everywhere.
We now have the true Enemy in plain view and the methodology of the enslavement, too. This comes hard on the heels of our discovery that Prince Philip collected $950 Trillion in "Life Force Value Annuities" out of the Canadian bankruptcy - most of which belongs to Americans...
Last but not least - Australia the Concealed Colony
The unwelcome book "Australia – The Concealed Colony" was removed from bookstores, and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) confiscated every copy they could find. However, the full text of the book can be viewed online.
Overview
"Australia: The Concealed Colony" is a submission by the sovereign people of Australia that was presented to the United Nations in 1999. The document argues that Australia continues to be governed under British colonial law, which is inappropriate for an independent sovereign nation.
The submission was compiled by senior researchers Frank Coningham, Geoffrey Skelton, and Ian Henke, with research assistance from several universities around the world. It was individually presented to all member nations of the UN and not one refuted its claims.
The submission includes two volumes and several annexures, detailing the historical and contemporary attempts by Australians to bring about a facility which would permit them to exercise their right to self-determination. It also requests the establishment of an International Criminal Tribunal (Australia) to address the issue.
The document asserts that the High Court of Australia, established under British domestic law, has endorsed and supported the intention of a United Kingdom invasion, which is an issue that comes under the jurisdiction of the War Crimes Commission.
The submission calls for an examination of the use of foreign law in contravention of international law and requests written permission from the United Nations, the League of Nations, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain Parliament to continue the use of foreign colonial law within the Commonwealth of Australia.
The book "Australia – The Concealed Colony" was removed from bookstores, and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) confiscated every copy they could find. However, the full text of the book can be viewed online.
The submission also highlights the continuing sovereignty of Aboriginal Nations and Peoples in Australia, who have never accepted British rule.
(Overview Source: Brave AI)
Australia The Concealed Colony Book Link: https://archive.org/stream/AustraliaConcealedColony1/AustraliaConcealedColony1_djvu.txt
Until next time. Henry David Thoreau (1817 - 1862)
